The New ChatGPT Model Can Be Your Philosopher, Good Friend and Most Dangerous Adversary All at Once
Journal of Materials Science Research and Reviews, Volume 6, Issue 2,
Page 195-208
Abstract
Every few decades, a new invention comes along and alters everything. By "major innovations," we refer to things like the internet and airplanes that have had a significant impact on improving people's quality of life. The next watershed event in human history will be. ChatGPT is available at this link. Open AI, a company specializing in AI research, developed it. The ChatGPT NLP model takes OpenAI's GPT-2 language transformer model and applies supervised and reinforcement learning methods to fine-tune it (an approach to transfer learning) on OpenAI's GPT-3 set of huge language patterns. This concept makes it possible for humans to have natural discussions with AI systems using only text. ChatGPT and AI are having a profound effect on the field of materials research. Artificial intelligence is speeding up the development of novel materials by helping scientists find and create them. Aerospace, electronics, healthcare, and even energy might all be affected by this. It has potential for use in speech and text-based virtual assistants and customer support applications. Users may better comprehend their conversational partners with the help of ChatGPT's subject detection, emotion recognition, and sentiment analysis tools. In addition, it can produce many chat threads to simulate natural interactions between the user and the bot. This article is about the recent developments in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) focusing ChatGPT. AI has advanced significantly over recent years, with a wide range of applications specially ChatGPT.
- ChatGPT
- artificial intelligence
- technology
- chatbots
- applications
How to Cite
References
Baker B. Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020); 2020.
Eysenbach G. The role of ChatGPT, generative language models, and artificial intelligence in medical education: A conversation with ChatGPT and a call for papers. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e46885.
Gilson A et al. How does ChatGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e45312.
Tsiamalou A et al. EEG in Neurorehabilitation: A bibliometric analysis and content review. Neurol Int. 2022;14(4): 1046-1061.
Sethi Y et al. Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review. J Clin Med. 2022:11(23).
Ouyang L et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2022;35:27730-27744.
Thiébaut R and Thiessard F. Artificial Intelligence in Public Health and Epidemiology. Yearb Med Inform. 2018; 27(1):207-210.
Hammad M. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(3):459-460.
Kostick-Quenet KM and Gerke S AI in the hands of imperfect users. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):197.
Gao CA et al. Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. bioRxiv. 2022:2022.
DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023;613(7944):423-423.
Patel SB and Lam K. ChatGPT: The future of discharge summaries? The Lancet Digital Health. 2023;5(3):e107-e108.
Suverein MM et al. Early extracorporeal CPR for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. New England Journal of Medicine. 2023;388(4):299-309.
ChatGPT User Statistics and Facts (100 million users reached in January 2023).pdf>.
Hutson M. Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature. 2022;611(7934):192-193.
King MR. The future of AI in medicine: A perspective from a Chatbot. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2023;51(2):291-295.
Aydin C, González Woge M and Verbeek PP. Technological environmentality: Conceptualizing technology as a mediating milieu. Philosophy and Technology. 2019; 32.
Bardin A. Philosophy as political technē: The tradition of invention in Simondon’s political thought. Contemporary Political Theory. 2018:17.
Godin B. Innovation contested. The idea of innovation over the centuries. Routledge; 2015.
Hamilton C Defiant Earth. The fate of humans in the Anthropocene. Polity; 2017.
Heras-Escribano M The philosophy of affordances. Palgrave Macmillan; 2019.
Malafouris L How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. MIT Press; 2013.
Nancy JL. The creation of the world or globalization. Suny Press; 2007.
Simondon G. On the mode of existence of technical objects.Univocal; 2017.
Simondon G Individuation in light of notions of form and information.: University of Minnesot Press; 2020.
Zwier J, Blok V and Lemmens P. Phenomenology and the empirical turn: A phenomenological analysis of Postphenomenology. Philosophy and Technology. 2016;29.
Verbeek PP. What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency and design. Pennsylvania State University Press; 2005.
Wang Y et al. Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media. Soc Sci Med. 2019;l240:112552.
Hudson A and Montelpare WJ. Predictors of Vaccine Hesitancy: Implications for COVID-19 Public Health Messaging. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15).
Lee SK et al. Misinformation of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):13681.
Mohamad E et al. Exposure to Misinformation, Risk Perception, and Confidence towards the Government as Factors Influencing Negative Attitudes towards COVID-19 Vaccination in Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22).
Lee SJ, Lee CJ and Hwang H. The impact of COVID-19 misinformation and trust in institutions on preventive behaviors. Health Educ Res. 2023;38(1):95-105.
Enders AM et al. On the relationship between conspiracy theory beliefs, misinformation, and vaccine hesitancy. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):e0276082.
Ullah I et al. Myths and conspiracy theories on vaccines and COVID-19: Potential effect on global vaccine refusals. Vacunas. 2021;22(2):93-97.
Sarker IH AI-Based Modeling: Techniques, Applications and Research Issues Towards Automation, Intelligent and Smart Systems. SN Comput Sci. 2022;3(2):158.
Korteling J et al. Human-versus artificial intelligence. Frontiers in artificial intelligence. 2021;4:622364.
McCarthy J et al. A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, august 31, 1955. AI magazine. 2006;27(4):12-12.
Brown T et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2020;33:1877-1901.
Wogu I et al. Artificial intelligence, alienation and ontological problems of other minds: a critical investigation into the future of man and machines. in 2017 International Conference on Computing Networking and Informatics (ICCNI). IEEE; 2017.
Howard J Artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work. American journal of industrial medicine. 2019;62(11):917-926.
Tai MC T The impact of artificial intelligence on human society and bioethics. Tzu-Chi Medical Journal. 2020; 32(4):339.
Stokel-Walker C AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should academics worry? Nature; 2022.
Stokel-Walker C and Van Noorden R What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature. 2023;614(7947):214- 216.
Chatterjee J and Dethlefs N. This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide and even your worst enemy. Patterns (N Y). 2023; 4(1):100676.
Sallam M et al. ChatGPT output regarding compulsory vaccination and covid-19 vaccine conspiracy: A descriptive study at the outset of a paradigm shift in online search for information. cureus. 2023; 15(2):e35029.
Biswas SS Role of Chat GPT in Public Health. Ann Biomed Eng; 2023.
Talias MA, Lamnisos D and Heraclides A Editorial: Data science and health economics in precision public health. Front Public Health. 2022;10:960282.
Castelvecchi D. Are ChatGPT and AlphaCode going to replace programmers? Nature; 2022.
Kung TH et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS digital health. 2023;2(2): e0000198.
Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023;613(7944):423.
O'Connor S and ChatGpt, Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse? Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;66:103537.
Huh S. Are ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:1.
Chen X et al. Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2020;1:100002.
Su J and Yang W. Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2022;100049.
Holmes W and Tuomi I State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education. 2022;57(4):542-570.
Nazari N, Shabbir MS and Setiawan R Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon. 2021;7(5):e07014.
Adams D and Chuah KM Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Research Writing: Current Trends and Future Potentials. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. 2022:169-184.
Stokel-Walker C AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays - should professors worry? Nature; 2022.
Algabri HK, Kharade K and Kamat R. Promise, Threats, And Personalization In Higher Education With Artificial Intelligence. Webology. 2021;18(6). ISSN: 1735-188X
Grunhut J, Marques O and Wyatt ATM. Needs, Challenges, and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education Curriculum. JMIR Med Educ. 2022;8(2): e35587.
McCoy LG et al. What do medical students actually need to know about artificial intelligence? NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:86.
Zeide E. Artificial intelligence in higher education: Applications, promise and perils, and ethical questions. Educause Review. 2019;54(3).
Patten SB et al. Major Depression in Canada: What Has Changed over the Past 10 Years? Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61(2): 80-5.
Puyat JH et al. How often do individuals with major depression receive minimally adequate treatment? A population-based, data linkage study. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2016;61(7)394-404.
Rudoler D et al. Closed for Business? Using a Mixture Model to Explore the Supply of Psychiatric Care for New Patients. Can J Psychiatry. 2019;64(8): 568-576.
Clark DM et al. Transparency about the outcomes of mental health services (IAPT approach): An analysis of public data. Lancet. 2018;391(10121):679-686.
Shahriar S and Hayawi K. Let's have a chat! A Conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, Applications and Limitations. arXiv preprint ar Xiv:2302.13817; 2023.
Sallam M, et al. ChatGPT applications in medical, dental, pharmacy, and public health education: A descriptive study highlighting the advantages and limitations. Narra J. 2023;3(1):e103-e103.
Lund BD and Wang T. Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News; 2023.
Huntingford Chris Machine learning and artificial intelligence to aid climate change research and preparedness. Environmental Research Letters. 2019;14.
Kadow Christopher, David Matthew Hall and Ulbrich Uwe Artificial intelligence reconstructs missing climate information. Nature Geoscience. 2020;13.
Woo TaeHo Artificial intelligence-based modelling for global warming analysis incorporated with the nuclear energy productions. International Journal of Global Warming. 2019;17.
Chen TJ. ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2023:10.1097.
-
Abstract View: 25 times
PDF Download: 11 times
