Water Release Kinetics of Hygroscopic Acrylamide Enbibed in CaCl2 by Thermogravimetric and Differential Scanning Calorimetry Methods

Nasrollah Hamidi *

Department of Biological and Physical Sciences/1890-Research, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC 29117, USA.

Mehrdad Yazadani-Pedram

Facultad de Ciencias Quirnicas y Farmaceuticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Hygroscopic thermo-responsive materials, such as poly(acrylamide) gel (PAAG), are appropriate candidates for building atmospheric water generators (AWGs) to address freshwater stresses for innovative industrial endeavors. The PAAG has been synthesized by radical polymerization of acrylamide and N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide in the presence of carbon nanotubes. The dry gel was embedded with calcium chloride to produce a deliquescent acrylamide hydrogel (DHG) capable of capturing environment vapor by 20% of its mass per day. Its highest water release rate was at temperatures close to 45 °C, the temperatures that can be achieved through the photothermal effect of sunlight. The Ea of DHG to release water has been found to be about 46 kJmole-1, which is close to the vaporization energy of water. The highest water release rate was closed to 45 °C, at the heating rate of 0.50 Kmin-1, and moved to a higher temperature as the heating rate increased due to the thermal lag effects. The DSC thermogram showed a transition centered around 50 °C, which coincides with TGA’s maximum water release rate. This indicates that the release of water by DHG was due to its phase transition from hydrophilic to hydrophobic, a phenomenon that also has been confirmed by other researchers.

Keywords: Hydrogel, dew collection, freshwater, desiccants, thermo-responsive gel, kinetics triplet

How to Cite

Hamidi , N., & Yazadani-Pedram , M. (2023). Water Release Kinetics of Hygroscopic Acrylamide Enbibed in CaCl2 by Thermogravimetric and Differential Scanning Calorimetry Methods. Journal of Materials Science Research and Reviews, 6(4), 655–669. Retrieved from https://journaljmsrr.com/index.php/JMSRR/article/view/276


Download data is not yet available.


Lu H, Shi W, Zhang JH, Chen AC, Guan W, Lei C, Greer JR, Boriskina SV, Yu G. Tailoring the desorption behavior of hygroscopic gels for atmospheric water harvesting in arid climates. Advanced Materials. 2022;34:2205344.


Graeber G, Díaz‐Marín CD, Gaugler LC, Zhong Y, El Fil B, Liu X, Wang EN. Extreme water uptake of hygroscopic hydrogels through maximized swelling‐induced salt loading. Advanced Materials; 2023.


Li R, Shi Y, Alsaedi M, Wu M, Shi L, Wang P. Hybrid hydrogel with high water vapor harvesting capacity for deployable solar-driven atmospheric water generator. 2018; 52:11367–11377. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.8b02852

Gou X, Guo Z. Hybrid Hydrophilic-Hydrophobic CuO@TiO2-Coated Copper Mesh for Efficient Water Harvesting. Langmuir. 2020;36:64–73. DOI:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03224

Gleick PH, Cohen M, Cooley H, Donnelly K. Fulton. Julian Ha, M-L Morrison J, Phurisamban R, Rippman H, Woodward S. The world’s water: The Report on Freshwater Resources; 2018;9.

ISBN SBN-13.978-1983865886.

Meza I, Siebert S, Döll P, Kusche J, Herbert C, Eyshi Rezaei E, Nouri H, Gerdener H, Popat E, Frischen J, et al. Global-scale drought risk assessment for agricultural systems. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 2020;20:695–712. DOI:10.5194/nhess-20-695-2020

Boretti A, Rosa L. Reassessing the projections of the world water development report. NPJ Clean Water. 2019;2:15. DOI:10.1038/s41545-019-0039-9

Ciampi M. ‘Water Divide’ in the Global Risk Society. International Review of Sociology. 2013;23:= 243–260.


Zhou X, Lu H, Zhao F, Yu G. Atmospheric water harvesting: A review of material and structural designs; American Chemical Society. 2020;2:671–684.

Rubin SJ. Water costs and affordability in the United States: 1990 to 2015. J Am Water Works Assoc. 2018;110:48–52. DOI:10.1002/awwa.1062

Spicer N, Parlee B, Chisaakay M, Lamalice D. Drinking water consumption patterns: An Exploration of Risk Perception and Governance in Two First Nations Communities. Sustainability. 2020;12: 6851,


FAO The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture – Systems at Breaking Point (SOLAW 2021); FAO; 2021.

ISBN: 978-92-5-135327-1.

Fresán U, Marrin D, Mejia M, Sabaté J. Water footprint of meat analogs: Selected Indicators According to Life Cycle Assessment. Water (Basel). 2019;11:728. DOI:10.3390/w11040728

Mekonnen MM, Gerbens-Leenes W. The water footprint of global food production. Water (Basel). 2020;12:2696.


Vanham D, Mekonnen MM. The Scarcity-Weighted Water Footprint Provides Unreliable Water Sustainability Scoring. 2021;756?:143992. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143992

Mahan D, Waissbluth O, Caceres Carcinogenic D. Non-carcinogenic health risks of arsenic exposure in drinking water in the rural environment. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage. 2020;6:165–174.

Guo Y, Zhou X, Zhao F, Bae J, Rosenberger B, Yu G. Synergistic energy nanoconfinement and water activation in hydrogels for efficient solar water desalination. ACS Nano. 2019;13:7913–7919.


Xu J, Zhang J, Fu B, Song C, Shang W, Tao P, Deng T. All-day freshwater harvesting through combined solar-driven interfacial desalination and passive radiative cooling. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:47612–47622.


Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci Adv. 2016;2.


Pérez-González A, Urtiaga AM, Ibáñez R, Ortiz I. State of the art and review on the treatment technologies of water reverse osmosis concentrates. Water Res. 2012; 46:267–283.


Siddiqui MA, Azam MA, Khan MM, Iqbal S, Khan MU, Raffat Y. Current trends on extraction of water from air: An alternative solution to water supply. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology; 2022.


Hamidi N, Gargallo L, Whitesides L. Water and atmospheric water generation in recent progress in science and technology. In; Afefy, Prof HM, Ed, BP International (a part of Sciencedomain International). 2023; 5:43–67

ISBN 9788119102136

Khalil B, Adamowski J, Shabbir A, Jang C, Rojas M, Reilly K, Ozga-Zielinski B. A review: Dew water collection from radiative passive collectors to recent developments of active collectors. Sustain Water Resour Manag. 2016;2:71–86.


Jarimi H, Powell R, Riffat S. Review of sustainable methods for atmospheric water harvesting. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies. 2020;15:253–276.

Azeem M, Noman MT, Wiener J, Petru M, Louda P. Structural design of efficient fog collectors: A review. Environ Technol Innov. 2020;20:101169.


Zhang Y, Zhu W, Zhang C, Peoples J, Li X, Felicelli AL, Shan X, Warsinger DM, Borca-Tasciuc T, Ruan X, et al. Atmospheric water harvesting by large-scale radiative cooling cellulose-based fabric. Nano Lett. 2022;22:2618–2626.


Anderson PJ, Miller AD, O’malley KA, Ceridon ML, Beck KC, Wood CM, Wiste HJ, Mueller JJ, Johnson JB, Johnson BD. Incidence and symptoms of high altitude illness in South Pole workers: Antarctic study of altitude physiology (ASAP). Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med 2011; 5:CCRPM.S6882.


Cashman S, Ma C. (Xin), Garland J, Morelli B. Overview of resource recovery-based sustainable water systems: Life Cycle Assessment Updates from US EPA’s Safe and Sustainable Water Research Program; 2018.

Ma X, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Liu K, Yang H, Li J, Akhlaghi YG, Liu H, Han Z, Liu Z. Combined rankine cycle and dew point cooler for energy efficient power generation of the power plants - A review and perspective study. Energy. 2022;238: 121688.


Park H, Haechler I, Schnoering G, Ponte M.D, Schutzius TM, Poulikakos D. Enhanced atmospheric water harvesting with sunlight-activated sorption ratcheting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14: 2237–2245.


Xi Z, Li S, Yu L, Yan H, Chen M. All-day freshwater harvesting by selective solar absorption and radiative cooling. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14:26255–26263.


Liu X, Beysens D, Bourouina T. Water harvesting from air: Current Passive Approaches and Outlook; American Chemical Society. 2022;4:1003–1024.

Kim S, Choi H. Switchable wettability of thermoresponsive core–shell nanofibers for water capture and release. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7:19870–19879.


Diouf D, Darmanin T, Diouf A, Dieng SY, Guittard F. Surface nanostructuration and wettability of electrodeposited poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxypyrrole) and Poly(3,4-Propylenedioxypyrrole) films substituted by aromatic groups. ACS Omega. 2018;3: L8393–8400.


Thakur N, Sargur Ranganath A, Sopiha K, Baji A. Thermoresponsive cellulose acetate-poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide) core-shell fibers for controlled capture and release of moisture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:29224–29233.


Echeverria C, Fernandes S, Godinho M, Borges J, Soares P. Functional stimuli-responsive gels: Hydrogels and Microgels. Gels. 2018;4:54.


Hamidi N, Zhu T. Characterization of amphiphilic cobaltocenium copolymers via size exclusion chromatography with online laser-light scattering and viscometric detectors. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B. 2021;60:30–50.


Wei M, Gao Y, Li X, Serpe MJ. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications. Polym Chem. 2017;8:127–143.


Guo Y, Bae J, Fang Z, Li P, Zhao F, Yu G. Hydrogels and hydrogel-derived materials for energy and water sustainability. Chem Rev. 2020;120:7642–7707.

Hanikel N, Prévot MS, Yaghi OM. MOF water harvesters. Nat Nanotechnol. 2020; 15:348–355.


Nguyen HL, Gropp C, Hanikel N, Möckel A, Lund A, Yaghi OM. Hydrazine-hydrazide-linked covalent organic frameworks for water harvesting. ACS Cent Sci; 2022.


Kallenberger PA, Fröba M. Water harvesting from air with a hygroscopic salt in a hydrogel–derived matrix. Commun Chem. 2018;1:28.


Yilmaz G, Meng FL, Lu W, Abed J, Peh CKN, Gao M, Sargent EH, Ho GW. Autonomous atmospheric water seeping MOF matrix. Sci Adv. 2020;6.


Zhao F, Zhou X, Liu Y, Shi Y, Dai Y, Yu G. Super moisture‐absorbent gels for all‐weather atmospheric water harvesting. Advanced Materials. 2019;31:1806446.


Díaz-Marín CD, Zhang L, Lu Z, Alshrah M, Grossman JC, Wang EN. Kinetics of sorption in hygroscopic hydrogels. Nano Lett. 2022;22:1100–1107.


Flory PJ. Principles of Polymer Chemistry; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY; 1953.

Bertrand T, Peixinho J, Mukhopadhyay S, MacMinn CW. Dynamics of swelling and drying in a spherical Gel. Phys Rev Appl. 2016;6:064010.


LaPotin A, Kim H, Rao SR, Wang EN. Adsorption-based atmospheric water harvesting: Impact of material and component properties on system-level performance. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52: 1588–1597.


Gid, B, Friedler E, Broday DM. Liquid-desiccant vapor separation reduces the energy requirements of atmospheric moisture harvesting. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:8362–8367.


Mulchandani A, Edberg J, Herckes P, Westerhoff P. Seasonal atmospheric water harvesting yield and water quality using electric-powered desiccant and compressor dehumidifiers. Science of The Total Environment. 2022;825:153966.


Mehta JR, Desai TK, Patel AK, Diyora HB, Rabadiya AS. Preliminary investigations on a novel rotating media liquid-air contacting device without liquid pool. In Proceedings of the Energy Procedia; Elsevier Ltd. March 1 2017;109:167–173.

Entezari A, Ejeian M, Wang R. Super atmospheric water harvesting hydrogel with alginate chains modified with binary salts. ACS Mater Lett. 2020;2:471–477.


Liu X, Wang X, Kapteijn F. Water and metal-organic frameworks: From interaction toward utilization. Chem Rev 2020;120:8303–8377.

Feng R, Xu, C, Song F, Wang F, Wang X.-L.L, Wang Y.-Z.Z. A bioinspired slippery surface with stable lubricant impregnation for efficient water harvesting. 2020;12: 12373–12381.


Zhu S-Q, Feng R, Liang Z-H, Wang X-L, Wang Y-Z, Song F. Efficient water harvesting enabled by porous architecture-containing hybrid surfaces. Ind Eng Chem Res; 2022.


Aleid S, Wu M, Li R, Wang W, Zhang C, Zhang L, Wang P. Salting-in effect of zwitterionic polymer hydrogel facilitates atmospheric water harvesting. ACS Mater Lett. 2022;4:511–520.


Pérez-Maqueda LA, Criado JM, Sánchez-Jiménez PE. Combined kinetic analysis of solid-state reactions: A Powerful tool for the simultaneous determination of kinetic parameters and the kinetic model without previous assumptions on the reaction mechanism. J Phys Chem A. 2006;110: 12456–12462.


Hamidi N. Upcycling Poly(Vinyl Chloride) waste tubes: Studies of thermal stability and kinetics of films made of waste polyvinylchloride tube at the initial steps of degradation. J Appl Polym Sci. 2023;140. DOI:10.1002/app.53663

Hamidi N, Yazdani‐Pedram M, Abdussalam N. Upcycling Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) wastes by solvent extraction: thermal stability and kinetics Studies of the Recovered PET. J Appl Polym Sci. 2022; 139:51905.


Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Favergeon L, Koga N, Moukhina E, Pérez-Maqueda L.A., Sbirrazzuoli N. ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for analysis of multi-step kinetics. Thermochim Acta. 2020;689:178597. DOI:10.1016/j.tca.2020.178597

Peterson JD, Vyazovkin S, Wight CA. Kinetics of the thermal and thermo-oxidative degradation of polystyrene, polyethylene and poly(Propylene); 2001; 202.

Dong Z, Yang Y, Cai W, He Y, Chai M, Liu B, Yu X, Banks SW, Zhang X, Bridgwater AV et al. Theoretical analysis of double logistic distributed activation energy model for thermal decomposition kinetics of solid fuels. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018;57:7817–7825.


Atkin P, De Paula, J. Physical Chemistry, 9th Edition; W. H. Freeman, 2009: New York, NY; 2009;9.

Sbirrazzuoli N. Advanced Isoconversional kinetic analysis for the elucidation of complex reaction mechanisms: A New Method for the Identification of Rate-Limiting Steps. Molecules. 2019;24:1683.


Ding J, Zhang X, Hu D, Ye S, Jiang J. Model-free kinetic determination of pre-exponential factor and reaction mechanism in accelerating rate calorimetry. thermochim acta. 2021;702:178983.


Sbirrazzuoli N. Determination of pre-exponential factors and of the mathematical functions f(α) or G(α) that describe the reaction mechanism in a Model-Free Way. Thermochim Acta. 2013; 564:59–69.