Journal of Materials Science Research and Reviews

Incorporating Rice Husk Ash in Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Binder

Maria Kaka Etete Enoh *

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Cross River State, Calabar, Nigeria.

Cynthia Samuel Abima

Department of Mechanical Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Ekanem Benedict Agbonko

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.

Mfon Udo Obot

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.

Milliscent Orok Ededet

Department of Wood Products Engineering, University of Cross River State, Calabar, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

---

Abstract

Geopolymers are interesting materials synthesized by activating aluminosilicate source(s) with alkaline activator(s). The activators often used for this purpose are alkali metals of silicates and hydroxides. Environmental impact assessment carried out on geopolymers however indicates adverse contribution of this process to several other environmental indices despite the reduction in CO₂ emission. Several biomass sources are known to possess a high silica content. This research investigates the effect of incorporating rice husk ash (RHA) in the production of geopolymers. 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 g of RHA was introduced as a source of silica into the geopolymer binders. Sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratio of 0, 1 and 1.5 was used for the synthesis. From the compressive and flexural strength tests, increasing the RHA content improved the performance of the binders. Optimum compressive and flexural strength was obtained at 10 g (15.25 MPa) and 4 g (3.45 MPa) RHA, content respectively. Binders produced with only sodium hydroxide (SH) solution and RHA showed a significant increase in strength as the RHA content increased.

Keywords: Geopolymer, metakaolin, sodium hydroxide, rice husk ash, sustainable materials

---

---

---

References

Longhi MA, Rodríguez ED, Walkley B, Zhang Z, Paula A. Metakaolin-based geopolymers: Relation between formulation, physicochemical properties and efflorescence formation, Compos. Part B. 2019;107671.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107671

Krishna RS, et al. Materialia A review on developments of environmentally friendly geopolymer technology, Materialia. 2021; 20:101212. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101212.

Ma S, Zhang Z, Liu X. Comprehensive Understanding of Aluminosilicate Phosphate Geopolymers: A Critical Review, Materials (Basel). 2022;15(17). DOI: 10.3390/ma15175961

Provis JL. Activating solution chemistry for geopolymers, Geopolymers Struct. Process. Prop. Ind. Appl. 2009;50–71. DOI: 10.1533/9781845696382.1.50

Almutairi AL, Tayeh BA, Adesina A, Isleem HF, Zeyad AM. Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021; 15.DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733

Heath A, Paine K, Mcmanus M. SC, J. Clean. Prod; 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.046

Habert G, Ouellet-Plamondon C. Recent update on the environmental impact of geopolymers, RILEM Tech. Lett. 2016; 1:17. DOI: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.v1.6

Akhtar N, et al. Ecological footprint and economic assessment of conventional and geopolymer concrete for sustainable construction, J. Clean. Prod. 2022; 380(P2):134910.DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134910

Singh K. Materials Today : Proceedings Experimental study on metakolin and baggashe ash based geopolymer concrete, Mater. Today Proc. 2020;xxxx. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.116

Mohapatra SS, Mishra J, Nanda B, Patro SK. A review on waste-derived alkali activators for preparation of geopolymer composite, Mater. Today Proc. 2022;56:440–446. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.400

Ogwang G, Olupot PW, Kasedde H, Menya E, Storz H, Kiros Y. Experimental evaluation of rice husk ash for applications in geopolymer mortars, J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2021;6(2):160–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobab.2021.02.008

Hadi MNS, Al-Azzawi M, Yu T. Effects of fly ash characteristics and alkaline activator components on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer mortar, Constr. Build. Mater. 2018;175:41–54.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.092

Jaya NA, Abdullah MMAB, Li LY, Sandu AV, Hussin K, Ming LY. Durability of metakaolin geopolymers with various sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide ratios against seawater exposure, AIP Conf. Proc. 2017;1887.

DOI: 10.1063/1.5003546

Lin H, Liu H, Li Y, Kong X. Properties and reaction mechanism of phosphoric acid activated metakaolin geopolymer at varied curing temperatures, Cem. Concr. Res. 2020,2021;144:106425.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106425

Tong KT, Vinai R, Soutsos MN. Use of Vietnamese rice husk ash for the production of sodium silicate as the activator for alkali-activated binders, J. Clean. Prod; 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.025

Skariah B, Yang J, Hung K, Abdalla JA, Hawileh RA, Ariyachandra E. Biomass ashes from agricultural wastes as supplementary cementitious materials or aggregate replacement in cement / geopolymer concrete : A comprehensive review, J. Build. Eng. 2020,2021;40: 102332. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102332